Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Audio Technica ATH-DSR9BT

alaTest has collected and analyzed 2 reviews of Audio Technica ATH-DSR9BT. The average rating for this product is 4.5/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Headphones for all reviews. Reviewers are impressed by the comfort. The soundstage also gets good feedback. There are some mixed views about the design, while there are some less positive views about the noise isolation and price.

sound, soundstage, comfort

price, noise isolation

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Headphones the Audio Technica ATH-DSR9BT is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 94/100 = Excellent quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 2 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

Showing 2 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 Show Reviews: from Australia | from other countries

Expert review by : Andrew Williams (trustedreviews.com)

Audio-Technica ATH-DSR9BT

 

Audio-Technica ATH-DSR9BT review: excellent sound, but there are a few minor design flaws.

Excellent soundstage coherence ; Fresh, detailed sound

Skewed mid-range ; No wired option ; Unremarkable battery life ; Annoying on-cup controls

The Audio-Technica ATH-DSR9BT deliver great – if not neutral – sound, but suffer a few little design issues.

Apr, 2018

Expert review by : Sasha Muller (expertreviews.co.uk)

Audio Technica ATH-DSR9BT review: Wireless and wonderful

 

Audio Technica's ATH-DSR9BT can put some of the best wired headphones in a tangle – but they're not for everyone

Astonishingly good sound quality ; Comfortable ; Good-looking

Expensive ; No 3.5mm cable option ; Relatively short battery life ; No active noise-cancellation

If like me, you’ve always assumed that wireless convenience and uncompromising sound quality were mutually exclusive, then Audio Technica’s ATH-DSR9BT ably prove a point. And the point is that we were both wrong.

Mar, 2018